Whitepapers

White Paper - Comparison of the Trimble MX9 and MX50

Issue link: https://geospatial.trimble.com/en/resources/i/1470951

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 7 of 16

Comparison of the Trimble MX9 and the Trimble MX50 mobile mapping systems 7 Comparing the imaging sensors Camera descriptions Both systems have the same 360° spherical camera. This camera is widely used in mobile mapping; one of the main reasons is that this camera is built on a global shutter CMOS sensor. In addition to the 360° spherical camera, the MX9 system has three additional planar cameras. One camera positioned at the back of the MX9 unit is aimed at the ground surface and is fixed. The two additional planar cameras are positioned at the front of the MX9 unit, one per side. These two side looking cameras can be reoriented if required. Reorienting a camera requires a new boresight camera calibration to provide the necessary alignment between images and point cloud data. Camera calibration is a process that can be done using the Trimble Business Center software. The following table shows the specifications for the two types of cameras: Camera performances The spherical camera and the planar cameras have the same CMOS sensor. The enhanced image quality obtained by the planar cameras is mainly because the lenses have a larger focal length, which is mostly double compared to the 360° spherical camera. Today, in both the MX50 and MX9 systems, the spherical cameras are mostly used for navigation and for coloring point clouds. Given the higher resolution, the planar cameras are mostly used for visual inspection. The higher GSD (Ground Sample Distance) resolution values enable operators to identify specific features and attributes that otherwise would not be recognizable from the panoramic images, as shown by the following examples.

Articles in this issue

view archives of Whitepapers - White Paper - Comparison of the Trimble MX9 and MX50